Re: [PATCH 2/2] dir: remove PATH_MAX limitation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 12.07.2014 00:29, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> Anyways, I'd like to kindly withdraw this patch in favor of Duy's version.
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/248310
> 
> Thanks; I've already reverted it from 'next'.
> 
> Is Duy's patch still viable?
> 

I think so. It fixes the segfault with long paths on Windows as well
(Tested-by: <me>), uses strbuf APIs as Peff suggested, and initializes the
strbuf with PATH_MAX (i.e. no reallocs in the common case either ;-) ).

AFAICT the first two patches of that series are also completely unrelated
to the untracked-cache, so we may want to fast-track these?

[01/20] dir.c: coding style fix
[02/20] dir.h: move struct exclude declaration to top level
[03/20] prep_exclude: remove the artificial PATH_MAX limit

...perhaps with s/if (!dir->basebuf.alloc)/if (!dir->basebuf.buf)/

@Duy any reason for not signing off that series?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]