On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 11:29 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > This is not how the rest of the current tests work. I will submit a
> > patch which fixes up the current --sort tests (but not every test, for
> > now) as well.
>
> I do not want to pile more work that is unrelated to the task at
> hand on your plate, i.e. clean-up work, so I would assign a very low
> priority to "fix up the current tests". At the same time, existing
> mistakes are not excuses to introduce new similar ones, hence my
> suggestions to the added code in the patch I saw.
>
It was trivial to fix at least the --sort tests, so I submitted a patch
that goes before this one to fix those as well.
Thanks,
Jake
��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�