Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] replace: add --graft option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> "Making sure A's parent is B" would be an
>>>>> idempotent operation, no?  Why not just make sure A's parent is
>>>>> already B and report "Your wish has been granted" to the user?
>>>
>>> ... and here you say we should report "your wish has been granted"...
>>
>> Normal way for "git replace" to report that is to exit with status 0
>> and without any noise, I would think.
>
> In a similar case "git replace --edit" we error out instead of just
> exiting (with status 0), see:
>
> f22166b5fee7dc (replace: make sure --edit results in a different object)

I do not care *too* deeply, but if you ask me, that may be a mistake
we may want to fix before the next release.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]