Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
> index ba882a1..aa58275 100644
> --- a/config.c
> +++ b/config.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> #include "exec_cmd.h"
> #include "strbuf.h"
> #include "quote.h"
> +#include "hashmap.h"
> +#include "string-list.h"
>
> struct config_source {
> struct config_source *prev;
> @@ -33,10 +35,23 @@ struct config_source {
> long (*do_ftell)(struct config_source *c);
> };
>
> +struct config_hash_entry {
> + struct hashmap_entry ent;
> + char *key;
> + struct string_list value_list;
> +};
> +
> static struct config_source *cf;
>
> static int zlib_compression_seen;
>
> +/*
> + * Default config_set that contains key-value pairs from the usual set of config
> + * config files (i.e repo specific .git/config, user wide ~/.gitconfig, XDG
> + * config file and the global /etc/gitconfig)
> + */
> +static struct config_set the_config_set;
> +
> static int config_file_fgetc(struct config_source *conf)
> {
> return fgetc(conf->u.file);
> @@ -1212,6 +1227,284 @@ int git_config(config_fn_t fn, void *data)
> return git_config_with_options(fn, data, NULL, 1);
> }
>
> +static int config_hash_add_value(const char *, const char *, struct hashmap *);
This is a funny forward declaration. If you define add-file and
friends that modify the config-set _after_ you define find-entry and
friends that are used to look-up, would you still need to do a
forward declaration?
In any case, please give names to these first two parameters as what
they are for can be unclear; because they are of the same type,
there is one less clue than there usually are.
The function signature makes it sound as if this is not specific to
"config"; what takes a hashmap, a key and a value and is called "add"
is a function to add <key, value> pair to a hashmap. Why doesn't it
take "struct config_set"? In other words, I would have expected
static int config_set_add(struct config_set *, const char *key, const char *value)
instead. Not a complaint, but is puzzled why you chose not to do
so.
I suspect almost everywhere in this patch, you would want to do
s/config_hash/config_set/. s/config_hash_entry/config_set_element/
might be a good idea, too. You have the concept of the "config
set", and each element of that set is a "config-set element", not a
"config-hash entry", isn't it?
> +static int config_hash_entry_cmp(const struct config_hash_entry *e1,
> + const struct config_hash_entry *e2, const void *unused)
> +{
> + return strcmp(e1->key, e2->key);
> +}
> +
> +static void configset_init(struct config_set *cs)
> +{
> + if (!cs->hash_initialized) {
> + hashmap_init(&cs->config_hash, (hashmap_cmp_fn)config_hash_entry_cmp, 0);
> + cs->hash_initialized = 1;
> + }
> +}
Have uninitializer here, immediately after you defined the initializer.
> +static int config_hash_callback(const char *key, const char *value, void *cb)
> +{
> + struct config_set *cs = cb;
> + config_hash_add_value(key, value, &cs->config_hash);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int git_configset_add_file(struct config_set *cs, const char *filename)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + configset_init(cs);
> + ret = git_config_from_file(config_hash_callback, filename, cs);
> + if (!ret)
> + return 0;
> + else {
> + hashmap_free(&cs->config_hash, 1);
> + cs->hash_initialized = 0;
> + return -1;
Does calling configset_clear() do too much for the purpose of this
error path? In other words, is it deliberate that you do not touch
any string-list items you may have accumulated by calling the
callback?
> +static struct config_hash_entry *config_hash_find_entry(const char *key,
> + struct hashmap *config_hash)
> +{
> + struct config_hash_entry k;
> + struct config_hash_entry *found_entry;
> + char *normalized_key;
> + int ret;
> + /*
> + * `key` may come from the user, so normalize it before using it
> + * for querying entries from the hashmap.
> + */
> + ret = git_config_parse_key(key, &normalized_key, NULL);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + hashmap_entry_init(&k, strhash(normalized_key));
> + k.key = normalized_key;
> + found_entry = hashmap_get(config_hash, &k, NULL);
> + free(normalized_key);
> + return found_entry;
> +}
> +
> +static struct string_list *configset_get_list(const char *key, struct config_set *cs)
> +{
> + struct config_hash_entry *e = config_hash_find_entry(key, &cs->config_hash);
> + return e ? &e->value_list : NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int config_hash_add_value(const char *key, const char *value, struct hashmap *config_hash)
> +{
> + struct config_hash_entry *e;
> + e = config_hash_find_entry(key, config_hash);
> + /*
> + * Since the keys are being fed by git_config*() callback mechanism, they
> + * are already normalized. So simply add them without any further munging.
> + */
> + if (!e) {
> + e = xmalloc(sizeof(*e));
> + hashmap_entry_init(e, strhash(key));
> + e->key = xstrdup(key);
> + memset(&e->value_list, 0, sizeof(e->value_list));
> + e->value_list.strdup_strings = 1;
Hmph, I thought you invented string_list_init() but perhaps it was
somebody else...
> + hashmap_add(config_hash, e);
> + }
> + string_list_append_nodup(&e->value_list, value ? xstrdup(value) : NULL);
Mental note: once "string list" is updated to make it a true
"string" list for whatever reason, we would be broken by such a
change because we throw a NULL in there. Just something to watch
out for in the future. Perhaps deserves a new comment in
string-list API to officially declare that such a use is supported
and must continue to work? I dunno.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void git_configset_init(struct config_set *cs)
> +{
> + cs->hash_initialized = 0;
> +}
This is somewhat strange; as we are preparing cs for use, why not
initialize the config_hash member and flip hash_initialized to true
instead?
> +int git_configset_get_value(struct config_set *cs, const char *key, const char **value)
> +{
> + struct string_list *values = NULL;
> + /*
> + * Follows "last one wins" semantic, i.e., if there are multiple matches for the
> + * queried key in the files of the configset, the value returned will be the last
> + * value in the value list for that key.
> + */
> + values = configset_get_list(key, cs);
> +
> + if (!values)
> + return 1;
> + assert(values->nr > 0);
> + *value = values->items[values->nr - 1].string;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +const struct string_list *git_configset_get_value_multi(struct config_set *cs, const char *key)
> +{
> + return configset_get_list(key, cs);
> +}
This is OK, but I would have expected that configset_get_value(),
knowing that its semantics is "grab all and pick the last one",
would call git_configset_get_value_multi() directly, which in turn
would mean there is no need for configset_get_list() intermediary.
> +void git_configset_clear(struct config_set *cs)
> +{
> + struct config_hash_entry *entry;
> + struct hashmap_iter iter;
> + if (!cs->hash_initialized)
> + return;
> +
> + hashmap_iter_init(&cs->config_hash, &iter);
> + while ((entry = hashmap_iter_next(&iter))) {
> + free(entry->key);
> + string_list_clear(&entry->value_list, 0);
> + }
> + hashmap_free(&cs->config_hash, 1);
> +}
> +
> +int git_configset_get_string(struct config_set *cs, const char *key, const char **dest)
> +{
> + const char *value;
> + if (!git_configset_get_value(cs, key, &value))
> + return git_config_string(dest, key, value);
> + else
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +int git_configset_get_int(struct config_set *cs, const char *key, int *dest)
> +{
> + const char *value;
> + if (!git_configset_get_value(cs, key, &value)) {
> + *dest = git_config_int(key, value);
> + return 0;
> + } else
> + return 1;
> +}
> + ...
> +static int git_config_check_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + if (the_config_set.hash_initialized)
> + return 0;
> + configset_init(&the_config_set);
> + ret = git_config(config_hash_callback, &the_config_set);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + return 0;
> + else {
> + hashmap_free(&the_config_set.config_hash, 1);
> + the_config_set.hash_initialized = 0;
> + return -1;
> + }
> +}
> +int git_config_get_value(const char *key, const char **value)
> +{
> + git_config_check_init();
> + return git_configset_get_value(&the_config_set, key, value);
> +}
> +
> +const struct string_list *git_config_get_value_multi(const char *key)
> +{
> + git_config_check_init();
> + return git_configset_get_value_multi(&the_config_set, key);
> +}
> +void git_config_clear(void)
> +{
> + if (!the_config_set.hash_initialized)
> + return;
> + git_configset_clear(&the_config_set);
> + the_config_set.hash_initialized = 0;
> +}
Move this deinitializer of the cached config system immediately
after git_config_check_init(), which is a lazy initializer.
It is somewhat unfortunate that git_config_get_* functions that are
parallel to git_configset_get_* functions cannot be simple macros
with the fixed &the_config_set parameter due to lazy initialization,
but I think it is OK. This round mostly looks good to me, except
for the points I mentioned above.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html