Re: [PATCH v20 24/48] tag.c: use ref transactions when doing updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/20/2014 04:43 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> Change tag.c to use ref transactions for all ref updates.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/tag.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c
> index c6e8a71..c9bfc9a 100644
> --- a/builtin/tag.c
> +++ b/builtin/tag.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,6 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	struct strbuf ref = STRBUF_INIT;
>  	unsigned char object[20], prev[20];
>  	const char *object_ref, *tag;
> -	struct ref_lock *lock;
>  	struct create_tag_options opt;
>  	char *cleanup_arg = NULL;
>  	int annotate = 0, force = 0, lines = -1;
> @@ -556,6 +555,8 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	const char *msgfile = NULL, *keyid = NULL;
>  	struct msg_arg msg = { 0, STRBUF_INIT };
>  	struct commit_list *with_commit = NULL;
> +	struct ref_transaction *transaction;
> +	struct strbuf err = STRBUF_INIT;
>  	struct option options[] = {
>  		OPT_CMDMODE('l', "list", &cmdmode, N_("list tag names"), 'l'),
>  		{ OPTION_INTEGER, 'n', NULL, &lines, N_("n"),
> @@ -701,11 +702,13 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	if (annotate)
>  		create_tag(object, tag, &buf, &opt, prev, object);
>  
> -	lock = lock_any_ref_for_update(ref.buf, prev, 0, NULL);
> -	if (!lock)
> -		die(_("%s: cannot lock the ref"), ref.buf);
> -	if (write_ref_sha1(lock, object, NULL) < 0)
> -		die(_("%s: cannot update the ref"), ref.buf);
> +	transaction = ref_transaction_begin(&err);
> +	if (!transaction ||
> +	    ref_transaction_update(transaction, ref.buf, object, prev,
> +				   0, !is_null_sha1(prev), &err) ||

Similar to the error in sequencer.c a few patches later (explained in
more detail in my comment on that patch), here you only do a check if
!is_null_sha1(prev), whereas the old code always did the check.  I think
you want

    ref_transaction_update(transaction, ref.buf, object, prev,
                           0, 1, &err) ||

Please check whether you have made the same mistake in other patches.

> [...]

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]