From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
> Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> t/t6050-replace.sh | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t6050-replace.sh b/t/t6050-replace.sh
>> index fb07ad2..d80a89e 100755
>> --- a/t/t6050-replace.sh
>> +++ b/t/t6050-replace.sh
>> @@ -18,6 +18,33 @@ add_and_commit_file()
>> git commit --quiet -m "$_file: $_msg"
>> }
>>
>> +commit_buffer_contains_parents()
>
> SP before (), perhaps?
Ok.
>> +{
>> + git cat-file commit "$1" >payload &&
>> + sed -n -e '/^$/q' -e '/^parent /p' <payload >actual &&
>> + shift &&
>> + : >expected &&
>> + for _parent
>> + do
>> + echo "parent $_parent" >>expected || return 1
>> + done &&
>
> You can redirect the entire loop to simplify the above 5 lines,
> which would read better, no?
>
> for _parent
> do
> echo "parent $_parent"
> done >expect
Ok, thanks.
>> + test_cmp actual expected
>
> As "test_cmp" normally runs "diff", it is better to compare expect
> with actual, not the other way around; running the test verbosely,
> i.e. "t6050-replace.sh -v", shows how the actual output differs from
> what is expected when diagnosing breakage and would be more useful
> that way.
Ok.
> If your goal is to test both the object contents with this code
> *and* the overall system behaviour with the "$child^$parent" below,
> perhaps they should be in the same "commit_has_parents" function,
> without forcing the caller to choose between the two or call both,
> no?
Yeah, will do.
Thanks,
Christian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html