Re: move detection doesnt take filename into account

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



thanks for the info!
then i suppose my bug is a petition to have name similarity instead use a different statistical matching algorithm.

On 07/01/2014 10:57 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

I think it does, but based on filename suffix. E.g. here is a rename of
three empty files with a suffix.

  3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
  rename 1.a => 2.a (100%)
  rename 1.b => 2.b (100%)
  rename 1.c => 2.c (100%)
This is not more than a chance.

We tie-break rename source candidates that have the same content
similarity score to a rename destination using "name similarity",
whose implementation has been diffcore-rename.c::basename_same(),
which scores 1 if `basename $src` and `basename $dst` are the same
and 0 otherwise, i.e. from 1.a to a/1.a is judged to be a better
rename than from 1.a to a/2.a but otherwise there is nothing that
favors rename from 1.a to 2.a over 1.a to 2.b.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]