Re: [PATCH 3/3] cache-tree: Write index with updated cache-tree after commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[]

diff --git a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh b/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
index 5383258..d50acb8 100755
--- a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
+++ b/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
@@ -16,8 +16,31 @@ cmp_cache_tree () {
 # We don't bother with actually checking the SHA1:
 # test-dump-cache-tree already verifies that all existing data is
 # correct.
+generate_expected_cache_tree () {
+	if [ -n "$1" ]
+	then
+		local dir="$1/"
+	else
+		local dir="$1"
+	fi

I think the Git test cases prefer "test" over "[]":

	if test -n "$1"
	then
		local dir="$1/"
	else
		local dir="$1"
	fi

And should there be a && after the "fi" ?
And as test -n tests for a non-zero string,
could we write like this (and drop the local ?)?

	if test -n "$1"
	then
		dir="$1/"
	else
		dir=""
	fi



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]