From: "Phil Hord" <phil.hord@xxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Jeremy Scott
<jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just encountered a situation where a merge was made, with no
apparent changes in files (ie no log), but the result was that some
files were deleted.
person A adds some files
person B adds some files from the same point
You mean from the same point in history, right? Not files with the
same filename or path?
person B commits and pushes.
person A commits -- now merge is required
a few more commits on top of person B's commit
I don't understand this step. Who adds a few more commits on top of B
and why?
person A merges - this removes the files that B added. There is no
log
of the files being deleted
A similar issue, by reference, just came up on the [git-users] list. The
reference was:
1. http://randyfay.com/content/avoiding-git-disasters-gory-story
In that case the problem was a mixture of tools and misunderstandings.
It may not be the same as your case, but could give insights into what's
happening between different developers.
Which Tools are You, person A and Person B using, with --version?
This sounds like an "evil merge" (see man gitglossary, and google),
but it's not clear to me how you arrived here.
When I tried to reproduce your issue with this script, it did not
remove any files unexpectedly:
------------------->8-----------------------
#!/bin/sh
set -e
mkdir foo && cd foo && git init
echo foo > foo && git add foo && git commit -mfoo
git checkout -b PersonA master
echo bar > bar && git add bar
git commit -m"PersonA: bar"
git checkout -b PersonB master
echo baz > baz && git add baz
git commit -m"PersonB: baz"
echo foo-conflict >> foo && git add foo
git commit -m"PersonB: foo"
git checkout PersonA
echo foo-different >> foo && git add foo
git commit -m"PersonA: foo (conflicts with PersonB)"
git log --oneline --all --stat
if ! git merge PersonB ; then
git checkout PersonA foo
git commit --no-edit
fi
git log --oneline --graph --stat
------------------->8-----------------------
A sneaky issue with merges is that they do not have a clear way to
show patch information -- the diff between the commit and its ancestor
-- because they have multiple ancestors. You can show diffs for a
merge relative to each of its parents, but it is not usually done for
you automatically. This is why making changes in a merge which are
not actually required for the merge is bad ("evil").
Clearly this is possible - was this a user error?
Probably, but we'd need to see how the user got there.
--
Philip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html