Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> refs.c | 13 ++-----------
> refs.h | 7 ++++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
> index dfbf003..a9f91ab 100644
> --- a/refs.c
> +++ b/refs.c
> @@ -3487,23 +3487,14 @@ int ref_transaction_create(struct ref_transaction *transaction,
> int flags, const char *msg,
> struct strbuf *err)
> {
> - struct ref_update *update;
> -
> if (transaction->state != REF_TRANSACTION_OPEN)
> die("BUG: create called for transaction that is not open");
>
> if (!new_sha1 || is_null_sha1(new_sha1))
> die("BUG: create ref with null new_sha1");
>
> - update = add_update(transaction, refname);
> -
> - hashcpy(update->new_sha1, new_sha1);
> - hashclr(update->old_sha1);
> - update->flags = flags;
> - update->have_old = 1;
> - if (msg)
> - update->msg = xstrdup(msg);
> - return 0;
> + return ref_transaction_update(transaction, refname, new_sha1,
> + null_sha1, flags, 1, msg, err);
> }
Hmmm.
This probably logically belongs to the end of the previous series
and not necessarily tied to reflog transaction, no?
At the beginning of ref_transaction_update() there also is the same
guard on transaction->state, and having both feels somewhat iffy.
Of course it will give a wrong BUG message if we removed the check
from this function, so perhaps the code is OK as-is.
> int ref_transaction_delete(struct ref_transaction *transaction,
> diff --git a/refs.h b/refs.h
> index db463d0..495740d 100644
> --- a/refs.h
> +++ b/refs.h
> @@ -283,9 +283,10 @@ struct ref_transaction *ref_transaction_begin(struct strbuf *err);
> /*
> * Add a reference update to transaction. new_sha1 is the value that
> * the reference should have after the update, or zeros if it should
> - * be deleted. If have_old is true, then old_sha1 holds the value
> - * that the reference should have had before the update, or zeros if
> - * it must not have existed beforehand.
> + * be deleted. If have_old is true and old_sha is not the null_sha1
> + * then the previous value of the ref must match or the update will fail.
> + * If have_old is true and old_sha1 is the null_sha1 then the ref must not
> + * already exist and a new ref will be created with new_sha1.
> * Function returns 0 on success and non-zero on failure. A failure to update
> * means that the transaction as a whole has failed and will need to be
> * rolled back.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html