On 2014-06-10 21:16, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:28:46PM -0400, Richard Hansen wrote: >> On 2014-06-10 16:06, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: >>> zsh --version >>> zsh 4.3.9 (i386-apple-darwin10.0) >> >> zsh 4.3.9 is over 5 years old (2008-11-03). Is that young enough that >> we should still try to support it? > > zsh 4.3.10 is the version in RHEL/CentOS 6, and people are still using > CentOS 5. At $DAYJOB we build git on both, so it would be nice if at > least the tests didn't fail. Looks like CentOS 5 has zsh 4.2.6, so when I rewrite the patch series I'll test zsh versions that are at least that old. > Skipping them on older versions (maybe using is-at-least) would be > fine by me. I don't think we'll need to skip the tests on old zsh versions -- running 'zsh -c' should still work even if 'emulate zsh -c' doesn't. Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html