On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:08:37PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> Note the update to t7700. It failed to turn on bitmaps,
> meaning we were actually confirming the wrong behavior!
After writing this, I was thinking about the test, and why we didn't
notice this regression. True, the test added to t7700 was checking the
wrong thing. But the test _before_ it was trying to check the right
thing, and still did not notice. It's because ee34a2b sabotaged it by
adding an explicit --no-pack-kept-objects, so we were no longer testing
the default behavior at all.
I think we should do something like this on top of the series I posted
earlier. And possibly look into what kind of crack I was smoking when I
wrote the original tests.
-- >8 --
Subject: t7700: drop explicit --no-pack-kept-objects from .keep test
We want to make sure that the default behavior of git-repack,
without any options, continues to treat .keep files as it
always has. Adding an explicit --no-pack-kept-objects, as
ee34a2b did, is a much less interesting test, and prevented
us from noticing the bug fixed by 64d3dc9 (repack: do not
accidentally pack kept objects by default, 2014-06-10).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
t/t7700-repack.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/t7700-repack.sh b/t/t7700-repack.sh
index 82d39ad..021c547 100755
--- a/t/t7700-repack.sh
+++ b/t/t7700-repack.sh
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ test_expect_success 'objects in packs marked .keep are not repacked' '
objsha1=$(git verify-pack -v pack-$packsha1.idx | head -n 1 |
sed -e "s/^\([0-9a-f]\{40\}\).*/\1/") &&
mv pack-* .git/objects/pack/ &&
- git repack --no-pack-kept-objects -A -d -l &&
+ git repack -A -d -l &&
git prune-packed &&
for p in .git/objects/pack/*.idx; do
idx=$(basename $p)
--
2.0.0.729.g520999f
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html