Am 10.06.2014 22:08, schrieb David Aguilar:
[Resent using René's correct email address this time, sorry for the noise]
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 07:55:58AM -0700, Elia Pinto wrote:
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test <cond> && test <cond>" spawning
one extra process by using a single "test <cond> -a <cond>" no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@xxxxxxxxx>
---
t/t5000-tar-tree.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh b/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
index 74fc5a8..ad6fa0d 100755
--- a/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
+++ b/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ check_tar() {
for header in *.paxheader
do
data=${header%.paxheader}.data &&
- if test -h $data -o -e $data
+ if test -h $data || test -e $data
then
This looks okay, but it raises a question for the original author
(René, I think that's you so I've added you to the To: line).
Should that be "test -f" instead of "test -e"?
With -f instead of -e the function would ignore pax path headers for
directories and special files. The latter is not relevant for git at
all and we don't currently have a test for long directory names, but why
restrict the code to handle only regular files?
A better change would be adding tests for symlinks and directories with
long names.
This is a very minor note and should not block this patch.
It's probably a change that's better made in a follow-up patch.
path=$(get_pax_header $header path) &&
if test -n "$path"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html