Re: [PATCH 4/6] pack-objects: stop respecting pack.writebitmaps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 02:07:37PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Another option is to track it to graduate to master during the next
> > cycle. I.e., decide that the possible regression isn't a big deal.
> 
> My gut feeling is that the last one is sufficient.  These low level
> subcommands that are designed to be used by scripts (aka plumbing)
> shouldn't have configuration options in the first place, and users
> shouldn't depend on them even if they were added by design mistake.

That is my gut, too (and why I posted the patch). I was mostly just
trying to make sure it was not me being lazy (it is easy to be so when
you are the one writing the patches, rather than the one reviewing
them or acting as maintainer). :)

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]