Re: [msysGit] [PATCH] mingw: redefine the wrapper macro after the corresponding function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 05.06.2014 18:56, schrieb Johannes Sixt:
> Am 05.06.2014 10:05, schrieb Stepan Kasal:
>> mingw.c defines several wrapper functionsi, like mingw_unlink().
>> These wrappers are deployed by macros like this:
>> 	#define unlink mingw_unlink
>> The function itself is preceded by #undef, leaving the wrapper out
>> of the game for the rest of mingw.c.
>>
>> This was not probably intentional; for example, there are three
>> calls to open() below the definition mingw_open() that probably
>> have no reason to circumvent the wrapper.
>> OTOH, there is one call to gethostbyname() before it was undefined;
>> probably happy that it actually calls mingw_gethostbyname().
>>
>> This patch adds back the #define after each wrapper definition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stepan Kasal <kasal@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  compat/mingw.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/compat/mingw.c b/compat/mingw.c
>> index a0e13bc..e7193c0 100644
>> --- a/compat/mingw.c
>> +++ b/compat/mingw.c
>> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ int mingw_unlink(const char *pathname)
>>  	       ret = unlink(pathname);
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>> +#define unlink mingw_unlink
> (etc...)
> 
> I don't particularly like this approach: It robs the precise control of
> which function we can invoke from other places in mingw.c.
> 
> Within mingw.c, if some other function inside mingw.c wants to use
> mingw_unlink, then it should be written as 'mingw_unlink(foo)', not
> 'unlink(foo)'.
> 

I very much like this approach. In fact, we already do this for e.g. mingw_raise.

> So, IMO the macros should be #undef'ed at the top of the file, and all
> users (like the open() and gethostbyname() invocations that you
> identified) should be audited and changed to call the function they
> actually need (i.e., the system open vs. mingw_open).
> 

I'm sceptical of moving all #undef's to the top. Other callers would typically want the wrapped version (i.e. mingw_*). At least I can't think of a scenario in which a higher level function would want to bypass the wrapper...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]