Re: Dangers of working on a tracking branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, February 15, 2007 at 16:00:23 (-0500) Nicolas Pitre writes:
>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Bill Lear wrote:
>
>> We are about to switch to git 1.5 from git 1.4.4.1.  I cannot remember
>> if someone posted about this, but what is the danger of working on a
>> tracking branch --- there are abundant cautions about doing this, but
>> I can't recall and can't find the reason this is bad.
>
>A tracking branch is supposed to be a local mirror of what is available 
>remotely.  If you commit local changes to it then you break that model.

Ok, so I break the model, what is the harm in that?  Can I no longer
pull from or push to the remote branch?  Do I corrupt something
locally?  Does something else break?  I'm trying to formulate an
explanation to our users why the 1.5 way is superior and I can't just
say "if you do that you break the model".


Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]