Re: [PATCH v11 36/41] refs.c: move the check for valid refname to lock_ref_sha1_basic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:

> Move the check for check_refname_format from lock_any_ref_for_update
> to lock_ref_sha1_basic. At some later stage we will get rid of
> lock_any_ref_for_update completely.

Do you know if this will cause any functional change?

What is the potential impact?  Is that impact worth it?  (Given how
broken the recovery codepaths currently are, I suspect this change is
worth it, but it seems worth documenting in the log message.)

Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]