Re: [PATCH 01/15] builtin/add.c: rearrange xcalloc arguments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:22:00AM +0900, Brian Gesiak wrote:
> My apologies! I based my work off of maint, branching off of eea591.
> 
> My reasoning was that Documentation/SubmittingPatches states that "a
> bugfix should be based on 'maint'". [1] Now that I think about it,
> this is probably not the kind of "bug" that statement had in mind.
> 
> Should I reroll the patch based on master?
> 
> - Brian Gesiak
> 
> [1] https://github.com/git/git/blob/4a28f169ad29ba452e0e7bea2583914c10c58322/Documentation/SubmittingPatches#L9
> 

OK, got it.  I should have read Documentation/SubmittingPatches more
closely like you did :-)  No need to reroll I can just use the maint
branch to test it out.  Thanks!

-- 
Jeremiah Mahler
jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx
http://github.com/jmahler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]