Hi,
>
>> /* "--git-dir" has been given */
>
> ... or it could have come from GIT_DIR environment, no?
Yes, it does not matter where it came from, but I'll correct the comment
>
> Does this "additional exclude" need to kick in if GIT_DIR is set to
> "/home/pasha/w/.git"? That is, when gitdir is ".git" or ends with
> "/.git"?
I don't think it needs to kick in in either of these cases, as
".git" is already handled by "treat_path()". Now, here ".git" is
excluded by "if (strcmp()) {", while the first case needs to be
addressed too. Agree.
>> +#
>> +# Create a tree:
>> +#
>> +# a b c d subdir/
>> +#
>> +# subdir:
>> +# e f g h meta/ ssubdir/
>> +#
>> +# subdir/meta:
>> +# aa
>> +#
>> +# subdir/ssubdir:
>> +# meta/
>> +#
>> +# subdir/ssubdir/meta:
>> +# aaa
>> +#
> It is not quite clear with this large blob of comment what are
> noises and what exactly are being tested. I think you have two
> directories called "meta", but which one is the repository? Or do
> you have yet another one next to {a,b,c,d,subdir} called "meta" that
> is not listed above?
>
> Given that the reason why people use --git-dir is so that they can
> put it completely outside the working tree (in which case, the usual
> "start from cwd and go upwards while trying to see if there is .git/
> that governs the working tree" logic would not work), readers would
> not expect to find the directory to be used as GIT_DIR in the
> hierarchy you are creating in the first place. Because of that, it
> is even more important to clearify which "meta" you mean to use as
> your GIT_DIR if you want to be understood by readers.
I guess I was too simplistic, need to clarify a bit. And indeed,
perhaps two distinct subtrees are needed to test the repository that
is outside the work-tree, that would just do a slightly cleaner job
Pasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html