Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > One thing that this misses (as does your original script) is the > reflogs. Doing "branch -m" to rename a branch will actually move the > reflogs, too, but there is otherwise no way to access that > functionality. > > It does not seem unreasonable to teach "git update-ref" to do renames to > take advantage of this (it would be fairly simple; the logic is already > encapsulated internally in a rename_ref function). Sounds sensible. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html