Re: [PATCH 2/9] strbuf: add strbuf_tolower function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>> > Yes, and that would be fine with me (I actually wrote strbuf_tolower for
>> > my own use, and _then_ realized that we already had such a thing that
>> > could be replaced).
>> ...
> ... I think
> the bigger question is: is this refactor worth doing, since there is
> only one caller?

If you wrote it for your own use and then realized that it is
applicable to this codepath, wouldn't that say that there are
multiple potential callers that would benefit from having it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]