Linus Torvalds wrote: > One thing that _might_ be a good idea for tags (if people _really_ want to > actually update tags under the same name) is to have a "parent" pointer > for tag objects, the same way we have for commits. That way you could - if > you really wanted to - create a chain of tags, and show the history of > them. Wouldn't it be better to just use reflog for given tag? That assuming of course that we could protect tag reflog from pruning... -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html