On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:15:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > Yeah, placing it in its own setup may be the best. There are quite > a many set-ups outside the tests in this script from the olden days, > so I am OK if left it as-is and have a separate clean-up patch after > this topic settles. I am also OK to add a new one "the new right way" > so that a later clean-up patch does not have to change what is added > in this step. I like the idea of limiting the scope of this data so it couldn't inadvertently impact later tests. But placing the same data inside multiple test cases creates duplication. Is there a way to define data once for a limited set of tests? -- Jeremiah Mahler jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx http://github.com/jmahler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html