Re: [PATCH] t6006-*.sh: Fix truncation tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexey Shumkin <alex.crezoff@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> AFAIU, Junio already applied my patches (existance of a branch
> as/pretty-truncate tells us that). So, we can only send other patches that
> fix errors brought with former patches.

No, NO, NOOOOO....

The existence of a branch merely means that I saw the patches, and
that I thought that the series was not completely useless.  In other
words, it indicates that I wanted to make sure that I won't forget
about the topic, and it was worth my time to create the branch and
apply there for that purpose.

Please do not read anything more than that.  Presense of a topic
branch by itself does not say that I _read_ the patches or I thought
they did not need reroll.

When such a branch is merged to 'next', that means I read the
patches myself, or I saw somebody whose judgement I and others in
the community trust read them and gave a positive response or an
Ack, and that I decided that the topic is in a good enough shape to
be worked on further with incremental updates.

You are talking about the latter state, but as/pretty-truncate is in
the former state.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]