Re: [msysGit] Re: [PATCH v2] config: preserve config file permissions on edits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Am 5/6/2014 2:17, schrieb Eric Wong:
>>> Users may already store sensitive data such as imap.pass in
>>> ..git/config; making the file world-readable when "git config"
>>> is called to edit means their password would be compromised
>>> on a shared system.
>>>
>>> [v2: updated for section renames, as noted by Junio]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  config.c               | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>>  t/t1300-repo-config.sh | 10 ++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
>>> index a30cb5c..c227aa8 100644
>>> --- a/config.c
>>> +++ b/config.c
>>> @@ -1636,6 +1636,13 @@ int git_config_set_multivar_in_file(const char *config_filename,
>>>                       MAP_PRIVATE, in_fd, 0);
>>>               close(in_fd);
>>>
>>> +             if (fchmod(fd, st.st_mode & 07777) < 0) {
>>> +                     error("fchmod on %s failed: %s",
>>> +                             lock->filename, strerror(errno));
>>> +                     ret = CONFIG_NO_WRITE;
>>> +                     goto out_free;
>>> +             }
>>
>> This introduces a severe failure in the Windows port because we do not
>> implement fchmod. Existing fchmod invocations do not check the return
>> value, and they are only interested in removing the write bits, and we
>> generally don't care a lot if files remain writable.
>>
>> I'm not proficient enough to add any ACL fiddling to fchmod that would be
>> required by the above change, whose purpose is to be strict about
>> permissions. Nor am I interested (who the heck is sharing a Windows box
>> anyway? ;-)
>>
>> Therefore, here's just a work-around patch to keep things going on
>> Windows. Any opinions from the Windows corner?
>>
>
> Since we use MSVCRT's chmod implementation directly which only checks
> for S_IWRITE,and Get/SetFileAttributes to simply set or clear the
> FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY-flag, perhaps we could do the same except
> using Get/SetFileInformationByHandle instead? That takes us in a
> better direction, IMO. Adding full ACL support seems like a bigger
> project.
>
> If there's no objection, I'll sketch up a patch for that...

OK, this turned out a bit more yucky than I assumed, because
SetFileInformationByHandle is only available on Windows Vista and up.
There's a static library (FileExtd.lib) that ships with MSVC that
emulates it for legacy support, I guess I should have a look at what
that does.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]