Re: [PATCH 03/31] refs.c: rename the transaction functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Rename the transaction functions. Remove the leading ref_ from the names
> and append _sha1 to the names for functions that create/delete/update sha1
> refs.
> ...
> -		transaction = ref_transaction_begin();
> +		transaction = transaction_begin();

Why?  Do we forsee that there will never be other kinds of
transaction, and whenever we say a "transaction" that will be always
about updating the refs and nothing else?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]