Re: [PATCH v8 10/44] refs.c: change ref_transaction_update() to do error checking and return status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
>
>> Update ref_transaction_update() do some basic error checking and return
>> non-zero on error. Update all callers to check ref_transaction_update() for
>> error. There are currently no conditions in _update that will return error but
>> there will be in the future.
>
> Probably worth passing a 'struct strbuf *err' argument.  Then callers
> can do
>
>                 die("%s", err.buf);
>

Done.

> and the error message can say which ref and whether we were trying to
> create a ref, or delete one, or whatever.
>
>> --- a/builtin/update-ref.c
>> +++ b/builtin/update-ref.c
>> @@ -197,8 +197,9 @@ static const char *parse_cmd_update(struct strbuf *input, const char *next)
>>       if (*next != line_termination)
>>               die("update %s: extra input: %s", refname, next);
>>
>> -     ref_transaction_update(transaction, refname, new_sha1, old_sha1,
>> -                            update_flags, have_old);
>> +     if (ref_transaction_update(transaction, refname, new_sha1, old_sha1,
>> +                                update_flags, have_old))
>> +             die("update %s: failed", refname);
>
> This could say
>
>                 die("update %s: %s", refname, err.buf);

Done.

>
> to give context about which command it was trying to execute.
>
> [...]
>> @@ -286,8 +287,9 @@ static const char *parse_cmd_verify(struct strbuf *input, const char *next)
>>       if (*next != line_termination)
>>               die("verify %s: extra input: %s", refname, next);
>>
>> -     ref_transaction_update(transaction, refname, new_sha1, old_sha1,
>> -                            update_flags, have_old);
>> +     if (ref_transaction_update(transaction, refname, new_sha1, old_sha1,
>> +                                update_flags, have_old))
>> +             die("failed transaction update for %s", refname);
>
> And this could say
>
>                 die("verify %s: %s", refname, err.buf);

Done.

>
> [...]
>> --- a/refs.h
>> +++ b/refs.h
>> @@ -242,12 +242,15 @@ void ref_transaction_rollback(struct ref_transaction *transaction);
>>   * be deleted.  If have_old is true, then old_sha1 holds the value
>>   * that the reference should have had before the update, or zeros if
>>   * it must not have existed beforehand.
>> + * Function returns 0 on success and non-zero on failure. A failure to update
>> + * means that the transaction as a whole has failed and will need to be
>> + * rolled back.
>> + */
>
> Thanks for this documentation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]