Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Remove 'git archimport'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No updates since 2010, and no tests.

NAK.

IMHO, this is quite unfriendly.

Is this removal based on your opinion, or Junio's position (or
consensus from maintainers from the list)? If there is a clear
consensus or direction for old code such as this, please let me know
(but copy martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx, not just my very old address!).

> Plus, foreign SCM tools should live out-of-tree anyway.

Says who? Is there consensus on this?

It's generally the privilege of the maintainer -- in this case Junio
or perhaps Linus -- to take harsh stances like this.

Junio, what's your position?



m
-- 
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]