Re: Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >

> > While I agree with you the this project is managed in a bit conservative
> > way
>
> Only a bit? I don't think I've been involed in a more conservative open
> source project.
>
> > you should really improve how you communicate with other developers,
> > it's such a pity your contributions are some times not included in
> > git.git just because of your attitude.
>
> But that's a theory. You don't *know* that they would have been included
> had I used a different attitude.

Well, you could at least try to act and communicate differently.

> In fact, people have contacted me privately saying similar things, and
> I'll give you the same challenge I gave them. If you think a different
> attitude would get my patches in, how about *you* write the commit
> messages and the discussions for one of my stuck patch series. I'll send
> the mails as if I had written the content.

No, sorry but I'm NOT interested in lying to git community.

Ciao,
-- 
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]