Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > There is no guideline as for what should be part of contrib. > > > > Some tools are actively maintained, others consist of a single commit. > > Some tools have active user-base, some aren't used by anyone. Some tools > > are on the path towards the core, others will never get there. Some > > tools are already out-of-tree and simply mirrored, others probably > > wouldn't survive out-of-tree. Some tools are production-ready, others > > don't even run. Some tools have tests, most don't. > > > > Junio has explained that he wrote this a long time ago, when Git was a > > different beast, now this no longer applies. > > > > The only way to find out if a tool belongs in contrib or not is to as > > Junio. > > > > Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > This is wrong. > > The reason I suggested splitting remote-hg out of my tree does not This particular patch has nothing to do with remote-hg. > have anything to do with "removal of disused and inactive" described > in the document. As written elsewhere, it was a response to > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/248063/focus=248457 > > where you said > > I don't want to do anything for a "contrib" tool. You are once more twisting the sequence of events. *First* you blocked any progres towards graduation 2014-05-06, even though I told you what John Keeping argued wasn't going to happen. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/247660/focus=248242 *After* that I decided not touch git-remote-hg/bzr on your tree any more 2014-05-08. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/248063/focus=248457 Do not attempt to construe the consequence as the cause. You caused it. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html