On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:10:24PM +0100, John Keeping wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:58:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > On a slight tangent, I tried this in a fairly young repository and got > > > this (with master at v2.0.0-rc2-4-g1dc51c6): > > > > > > $ git blame Makefile | head -5 > > > 7a3fc144 (John Keeping 2013-12-26 17:37:53 +0000 1) REL_VERSION = v0.2 > > > 5c9829f9 (John Keeping 2013-07-29 17:03:26 +0100 2) > > > 5c9829f9 (John Keeping 2013-07-29 17:03:26 +0100 3) # The default target is... > > > ^f7fae99 (John Keeping 2013-03-24 17:14:40 +0000 4) all:: > > > ^f7fae99 (John Keeping 2013-03-24 17:14:40 +0000 5) > > > > > > f7fae99 is the initial commit in the repository, so shouldn't the last > > > two lines blame to that, not a non-existent ancestor? > > > > It is not saying f7fae99^, is it? It is debatable if it is correct > > to mark the root commit as a boundary, but that is what it is > > showing, I think. In other words, "this line hasn't changed since > > the inception of the project". > > Yes, it's marking it as a boundary but I'm not convinced that's correct. But it is intentional. I get the output I expect if I use `git blame --root`. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html