Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx> writes: > >> Your premise is _not_ assumed in my statement. My premise was "a >> pointer to something of the same type of [the struct's] first member". >> That does quite explicitly _not_ state that an object of struct type is >> in existence. > > So you are not taking about struct object_id, and it's irrelevant to > this thread. > > This thread is about objects of type struct object_id, and their address > is always the same as the address of its first member. Nothing else is > relevant. Have it your way. I am too old for selective quotation games. -- David Kastrup -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html