Re: [PATCH] subtree/Makefile: Standardize (esp. for packagers)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Denholm wrote:
> Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_git@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:35:13PM +1000, James Denholm wrote:
> >> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Agreed.  It also doesn't help that when subtree patches are proposed
> > (especially new features instead of obvious bugs), there often seems
> > to be little or no feedback from anyone.
> >
> > --------
> > Depending on how much time you have:
> >
> > This may be outside the scope of work you were planning on,
> 
> While current, immediate focus is really just getting the makefile fixed
> up and hopefully then have more people package subtree by default,
> overall I'll very likely extend that to general work on subtree and such.

I think you should take a look at the Makefile of
contrib/remote-helpers. I bet something simple like that would work just
fine for subtree.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]