On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 01:55:36PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > W. Trevor King wrote: > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:14:29PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > W. Trevor King wrote: > > > > My proposed --prompt behavior is for folks who think “I often run > > > > this command without thinking it through all the way. I'm also > > > > not used to reading Git's output and using 'reset --hard' with the > > > > reflog to reverse changes. Instead of trusting me to only say > > > > what I mean or leaving me to recover from mistakes, please tell me > > > > what's about to change and let me opt out if I've changed my > > > > mind.” > > > > > > Unfortunately those folks by definition wouldn't know about the > > > --prompt option. > > > > But once such folks are identified, you just have to convince them > > (once) to set the pull.prompt config. That's a lot easier than > > convincing them (for every pull) to set the appropriate ff flag. > > It wouldn't matter if by the default non-fast-forward merges are > rejected. It would matter if you didn't want them making non-fast-forward merges (e.g. for explicitly-merged topic branches). Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature