Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Dave Bradley <dbradley2@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I’m very new to ‘git’ github. I reported the #178 issue in github and the >> issue has been closed, I believe this means no further discussion. > > When you say "the #178 issue in github", you really mean "issue #178 > for Git for Windows on GitHub", available at > https://github.com/msysgit/git/issues/178 for those interested. > > That issue tracker is for the Windows port of Git for Windows. It's > intended to track breakages in Git for Windows compared to Git on, say > Linux. It's not a general issue tracker for problems with Git. Still, > it seems a lot of people think "I downloaded Git for Windows, and > here's something that didn't work the way I expected it to, I'll file > a bug". Those kinds of bug-reports usually gets closed quickly, as > it's outside the scope of Git for Windows to decide how Git should > behave - we try to make it behave consistently between Windows and > Unixy-platforms. > > This is indeed the right forum to address your issue. So thank you for > moving the discussion here. Hmmmmmm, everything you said in the earlier paragraphs is correct, but I am having a feeling that this is either an issue specific to the Windows port, or more likely a user error, depending on who is giving the extra dq quoting. From the command line: $ git show --pretty='format:"%an %ad"' "Junio C Hamano Wed Apr 30 11:01:42 2014 -0700" Because the 'format:' specifier requests to put dq around these two, we respond by putting dq around these two, just as we were asked to do. The way to ask %an followed by SP followed by %ad and nothing else is $ git show --pretty='format:%an %ad' Junio C Hamano Wed Apr 30 11:01:42 2014 -0700 Especially this part from the original tells me that this is a user error and there is nothing wrong in either the generic Git or in the Windows port. G:\w....x>git log --all "--pretty=format:"%an %ad"" -- pom.xml fatal: bad revision '%ad' Separating the tokens on that command line, we would get: git log --all --pretty=format:%an %ad -- pom.xml So it told git to run the log subcommand with arguments that tells it to "include all tips of refs to the starting set", "show them using a custom format %an", "include %ad to the starting set", "everything that follows are not revs but pathspecs", and then finally "pom.xml is the pathspec to limit to paths the user is interested in". "%ad is not a rev" is perfectly valid. You cannot take --pretty=format:"%ad %an" that you see in tutorials and random web pages too literally. The double quotes you see in that example is our way to tell that "--pretty=format:%ad %an" (what is inside these dq) is expected to be fed to Git as a single argument. The examples you see typically follow the convention to show what you _would_ give to shell to achieve that, and shell's command line parser needs these dq to make sure that the SP between %an and %ad is not taken as an argument separator. Your custom front-end may take a different approach to let you specify what individual arguments are on your command line, and you would have to follow its convention. The user needs to be careful about how shell quoting works on his/her command line, and that is all, I would think. Visiting an earlier part of the original issue report: Getting a fatal failure when using the following --pretty=format:"%an %ad" via a programmed execution from within a programming language. (Java using the execution capabilities puts the ' --pretty=format:"%an %ad" ' as an argument). I take that "Java using ..." to mean that the user wants to see his machinery eventually do an equivalent to: execl('git', 'git', 'log', '--pretty=format:%an %ad', ...); but it somehow is getting execl('git', 'git', 'log', '--pretty=format:%an', '%ad', ...); due to reason unknown to us that is not in the report. Without knowing what the end-user input to the front-end that calls into that "Java" machinery is and what the argument separating convention that is employed by the front-end is, I cannot tell where the single argument is split into two. The problem may either be in that front-end program and not in the end-user input. Or the problem may be in Windows port letting the Windows library split command line at a funny point. In any case, it does not sound like it is a problem in Git. If the command fed to the equivalent to execl() above were not 'git' but any program, it will suffer from the same issue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html