Re: git-cvsserver doesn't respect core.sharedrepository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 2007, February 13, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Ummm. What I tried to say is that this is intended behaviour, not bad
> behaviour. The file does not have to have write permissions for the
> group. The _directory_ has to have them.

It's not just write permissions.  The default umask could also prevent 
read access by the group - the new ref needs to be readable by the 
group.


Andy
-- 
Dr Andrew Parkins, M Eng (Hons), AMIEE
andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]