David Kastrup wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote: > > > >> Well, there you have it. The ones that do any kind of relevant change > >> are the ones that need thinking about and consideration. And when you > >> are so verbose about them that > >> > >> a) you are getting on people's nerves > >> b) nobody else finds something worth saying that you did not already say > >> > >> then the net effect is that it feels to the person in question he's > >> mainly doing you (and not all that many others) a favor by investing > >> the work for properly considering it and its consequences. > > > > This is the last time I say it: this is demonstrably false. > > Feelings are not categorizable as "demonstrably false". It's demonsrable by the challenge below. > > You claim that relevant changes can be made if the submitter is not so > > verbose (and less aggressive and what not). > > > > This is obviously not the case. Show me any change of importance done > > in the last two years, hell, make it four. And by change I mean > > something that was one way before, and was another way after. > > The default behavior of "git push". This is a minor change that not many people would notice, and it has not actually happend. But fine, let's count it as one. > Colorized diffs. That's not a change. > "git add dir/" That doesn't count as an important change. > can now remove files. Irrelevant. > "git gc --aggressive" has been sanitized. Irrelevant. Nobody did notice. That's all you could list for *four* years? None of that would even be noticed by most of our users, maybe push.default (when it actually happens), but that's *one*. *One* important change in *four* years. That's demonstration that change just does not happen. And if you disagree, then we'll agree to disagree. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html