Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have git-cvsserver call hooks/update before really altering the ref

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have git-cvsserver call hooks/update before really altering the ref
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:43:05 -0800
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200702131512.45412.andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx> (Andy Parkins's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:12:45 +0000")
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

As a principle, I am in favor of this.  Perhaps post 1.5.0 after
hearing what real cvsserver users have to say on the list.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have git-cvsserver call hooks/update before really altering the ref
  - From: Andy Parkins
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have git-cvsserver call hooks/update before really altering the ref
  - From: Nicolas Pitre

References:
- [PATCH/RFC] Have git-cvsserver call hooks/update before really altering the ref
  - From: Andy Parkins

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Only show log entries for new revisions in hooks--update
Next by Date: Re: Including the release notes in the git-1.5.0 release?
Previous by thread: [PATCH/RFC] Have git-cvsserver call hooks/update before really altering the ref
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have git-cvsserver call hooks/update before really altering the ref
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]