Re: [PATCH 1/2] blame: large-scale performance rewrite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Thanks for doing this. Unfortunately I can't read the patch itself as
> I am also trying to improve JGit's blame code for $DAY_JOB, and JGit
> is BSD licensed.

Actually, I'd have suggested asking $EMPLOYER to buy the rights for
looking at the code, but as I wrote previously, I'd seriously doubt that
he'd get his money's worth for use in a _Java_ implementation.

The C code I proposed is good for files with many small changes: I'd
suggest benchmarking your JGit code with some of them.  If the JGit is
still dominated by unpacking, your implementation should be fine.  The
current C version instead thrashes around digging through its own
all-purpose single linear list.

Here are two real-world test cases:

git://git.savannah.gnu.org/emacs.git
git blame [-M / -C] src/xdisp.c

http://repo.or.cz/r/wortliste.git
git blame [-M / -C] wortliste

The latter one is _really_ taking a severe hit from the O(n^2)
algorithms.  If your benchmarks for that one still point mostly to the
unpacking, your jgit blame should be fine regarding the stuff
I reimplemented.

-- 
David Kastrup
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]