Re: [PATCH v3 04/19] refs.c: return error string from ref_update_reject_duplicates on failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:

> --- a/refs.c
> +++ b/refs.c
> @@ -3393,6 +3393,7 @@ static int ref_update_compare(const void *r1, const void *r2)
>  }
>  
>  static int ref_update_reject_duplicates(struct ref_update **updates, int n,
> +					char **err,
>  					enum action_on_err onerr)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -3400,6 +3401,11 @@ static int ref_update_reject_duplicates(struct ref_update **updates, int n,
>  		if (!strcmp(updates[i - 1]->refname, updates[i]->refname)) {
>  			const char *str =
>  				"Multiple updates for ref '%s' not allowed.";
> +			if (err) {
> +				*err = xmalloc(PATH_MAX + 41);
> +				snprintf(*err, PATH_MAX + 41, str,
> +					 updates[i]->refname);
> +			}

Same issues as the previous patch: it's too easy to get the buffer size
wrong when updating the message (or, worse, when making it
translatable).  aprintf or a strbuf should work better.

Otherwise seems sensible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]