Re: [PATCH 11/11] walker.c: use ref transaction for ref updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 04/17/2014 09:46 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
>> Switch to using ref transactions in walker_fetch(). As part of the refactoring
>> to use ref transactions we also fix a potential memory leak where in the
>> original code if write_ref_sha1() would fail we would end up returning from
>> the function without free()ing the msg string.
> ...
> Aside from my other comments, patches 01-10 in the series looked fine.
> Thanks!

Thanks, both.

When this is queued on 'pu', it appears that t5550 breaks.  I had to
futz with conflicts with the lockfile topic, so a botched conflict
resolution might be a cause for the breakage, though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]