Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> I agree that we can assume editors can grok files with LF end-of-line 
>> just fine and we would not need to do the reverse conversion on checkout 
>> paths (e.g. "read-tree -u", "checkout-index").
>
> In that case, a simple pre-commit hook would suffice.
>
> No, the problem mentioned by Mark was a very real one: you _cannot_ rely 
> on Windows' editors not to fsck up with line endings. The worst case is if 
> the file contains _some_ CRLF and _some _LF_. Almost always I had the 
> problem that it now converted _all_ LFs to CRLFs. Even those which already 
> were converted.
>
> So, if we are to support text mode, it is not one-way. If we do one-way, 
> we really do _not_ support text mode, but pre-commit conversion to LF 
> style text. And in this case, core git does not need _any_ change.

Well I disagree in two counts.

 - I do not see how you propose to solve some CRLF and some LF
   case with both-ways conversion.

 - Pre-commit hook would not be sufficient.  In a edit, diff,
   test and then commit cycle, diff and test step needs to look
   at whatever the editor left on the filesystem, so the changes
   to populate-filespec is needed to make diff part work.


   

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]