Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> >  (c) Profit!
> 
> Not so fast.

Aww! And just when I _finally_ had a "step 2".

> In order for this to be _useful_, you also have to have a way to _extract_ 
> the text blobs. Not only for read-tree, but _also_ for diff.

Actually, my argument is that we don't need it all that much.

For example, your "read-tree" argument is actually wrong. Anything that is 
in a tree is _already_ fixed to be '\n'. So as long as we keep to things 
like

	git diff version1..version2

we'll actually always get the right version.

Also, the index will make sure that we don't even *try* to diff normal 
checked out files.

So the only time you actually really need to test the .gitattributes file 
is when you do an "open blob in working tree". And once you do that 
function right, and just make sure both git-update-index and yes, the 
"diff against working tree" cases use it, you really should be mostly 
done.

Both git-update-index and git-diff-files want basically the same 
interface:

	struct file_buf {
		const char *buf;
		unsigned long size;
		int flags;
	}

	int read_file(const char *path, struct file_buf *);
	close_file(struct file_buf *);

and we should use that instead of the current "open + stat + mmap/read + 
close" sequences.

It really shouldn't be too nasty.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]