Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Make update refs more atomic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> I am not sure if that is the right way to go, or instead change all
>> create/update/delete to take locks without adding a new primitive.
>
> ack.

Hmph.  When I say "I am not sure", "I dunno", etc., I do mean it.

Did you mean by "Ack" "I do not know, either", or "I think it is
better to take locks early everywhere"?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]