On Tue, Apr 08 2014, Robert Dailey wrote: > I have more details about my inquiry on StackOverflow: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22823768/view-git-log-with-merges-for-only-certain-branches > > Basically I'd like to know if it is possible to show the graph for > ONLY branches that I list. The key here is that the graph should also > show relationships between only those branches that I list. In other > words, any ancestors that I do not explicitly specify should not be > rendered in the graph. What about using ^<branch> notation to exclude certain branches? See for example SPECIFYING RANGES in git-rev-parse(1). -Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html