Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2014, #01; Fri, 4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/04/14 19:35, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 05.04.2014 11:19, schrieb Johannes Sixt:
>> Am 04.04.2014 22:58, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>> * sz/mingw-index-pack-threaded (2014-03-19) 1 commit
>>>  - Enable index-pack threading in msysgit.
>>>
>>>  What is the status of this topic?  A failure report exists
>>>  ($gmane/245170), and I am aware of Duy's $gmane/245034 but that was
>>>  where the discussion stalled.  Is everybody waiting for everybody
>>>  else to get the discussion unstuck?
>>
>> I still have to cross-check Duy's patch. I'll hopefully get to it in the
>> next days and report back.
> 
> The test suite passes with Duy's patch ($gmane/245034), but t5302 fails
> with this patch with a MinGW build. The patches touch the Cygwin
> configuration, but I cannot test a Cygwin build.

I haven't tested these on cygwin yet. However, only the old version of
cygwin is affected (newer cygwin has a thread-safe pread) and, since I
no longer have an old installation, I _can't_ test it anyway. :(
(I updated cygwin earlier today and received a brand new cygwin dll
with today's date!).

> I have, however, lost track of what the objective of these patches is.
> Is the threaded version significantly faster, and these patches are
> worth it?

Indeed. I haven't seen any numbers.

ATB,
Ramsay Jones



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]