Aside from avoiding a tiny bit of work, this makes it transparently
obvious that old_sha1 and new_sha1 are identical. It is arguably a
bit silly to have to set new_sha1 in order to verify old_sha1, but
that is a problem for another day.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
builtin/update-ref.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builtin/update-ref.c b/builtin/update-ref.c
index 5f197fe..51adf2d 100644
--- a/builtin/update-ref.c
+++ b/builtin/update-ref.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static const char *parse_cmd_verify(struct strbuf *input, const char *next)
if (!parse_next_arg(input, &next, &value)) {
update_store_old_sha1(update, value.buf);
- update_store_new_sha1(update, value.buf);
+ hashcpy(update->new_sha1, update->old_sha1);
} else if (!line_termination)
die("verify %s missing [<oldvalue>] NUL", ref.buf);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html