[PATCH v3 02/27] t1400: provide more usual input to the command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The old version was passing (among other things)

    update SP refs/heads/c NUL NUL 0{40} NUL

to "git update-ref -z --stdin" to test whether the old-value check for
c is working.  But the <newvalue> is empty, which is a bit off the
beaten track.

So, to be sure that we are testing what we want to test, provide an
actual <newvalue> on the "update" line.

Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 t/t1400-update-ref.sh | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/t/t1400-update-ref.sh b/t/t1400-update-ref.sh
index fa927d2..29391c6 100755
--- a/t/t1400-update-ref.sh
+++ b/t/t1400-update-ref.sh
@@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ test_expect_success 'stdin -z update refs works with identity updates' '
 
 test_expect_success 'stdin -z update refs fails with wrong old value' '
 	git update-ref $c $m &&
-	printf $F "update $a" "$m" "$m" "update $b" "$m" "$m" "update $c" "" "$Z" >stdin &&
+	printf $F "update $a" "$m" "$m" "update $b" "$m" "$m" "update $c" "$m" "$Z" >stdin &&
 	test_must_fail git update-ref -z --stdin <stdin 2>err &&
 	grep "fatal: Cannot lock the ref '"'"'$c'"'"'" err &&
 	git rev-parse $m >expect &&
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]