Re: [RFC] submodule: change submodule.<name>.branch default from master to HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@xxxxxx> writes:

> I'd prefer a solution that doesn't change any defaults for the
> checkout use case (again). Maybe it is a better route to revert
> this series, then add tests describing the current behavior for
> checkout submodules as a next step before adding the branch mode
> for rebase and merge users again?

Sounds like a good idea to revert the entire series, as that would
give us longer to think the whole thing through.  It would certainly
avoid unexpected fallout in 2.0 where we already have other changes,
all of which are known/designed to be backward incompatible with a
set of carefully planned transition plans.  This submodule change
may have meant well, but does not seem to sit well together with
these other changes.

Perhaps in 2.1 or 2.2.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]