Re: Efficiency of initial clone from server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Jon Smirl wrote:

> On 2/11/07, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > remote: Total 63, written 63 (delta 0), reused 63 (delta 0)
> > > 100% (63/63) done
> > > fatal: pack: not a valid SHA1
> > > New branch: 0953670fbcb75e26fb93340bddae934e85618f2e
> >
> > What version of git is this?  That looks like we're assuming the word
> > pack was an object, but I'm not sure why we would do such a thing...

This "pack" comes from pack-index when providing the name of the pack.
It is either "pack" or "keep" and specifies the name of the .keep file 
to remove in the later case.
This is caught by git-fetch.sh with some code identified with a comment 
that reads: "# special line coming from index-pack with the pack name"

> jonsmirl@jonsmirl:/usr/local/bin$ git --version
> git version 1.5.0.rc2.g53551-dirty

You must have conflicting vintage of GIT installations on your machine 
with missing support for the "pack" and "keep" stuff described above.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]